RT-qPCR half-reaction optimization for the detection of SARS-CoV-2.

INTRODUCTION: The main laboratory test for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is the reverse transcription real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). However, RT-qPCR is expensive because of the number of tests required. This study aimed to evaluate an alternative to the RT-qPCR approach for the detection of sudden acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that is half of the total volume currently recommended by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. METHODS: The analytical limit of detection (LoD) and the reaction efficiency using half volumes of the RT-qPCR assay were evaluated for the N1 and N2 regions using a synthetic control RNA. A panel of 76 SARS-CoV-2-positive and 26 SARS-CoV-2-negative clinical samples was evaluated to establish clinical sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: The RT-qPCR assay efficiency was 105% for the half and standard reactions considering the N2 target and 84% (standard) and 101% (half) for N1. The RT-qPCR half-reaction LoD for N1 and N2 were 20 and 80 copies/µL, respectively. The clinical sensitivity and specificity were 100%. The half reaction presented a decrease of up to 5.5 cycle thresholds compared with standard RT-qPCR. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the RT-qPCR half-reaction proved feasible and economic for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA.

Quantitative detection of BK virus in kidney transplant recipients: a prospective validation study.

INTRODUCTION: BK virus (BKV) infection in renal transplant patients may cause kidney allograft dysfunction and graft loss. Accurate determination of BKV viral load is critical to prevent BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) but the cut-off that best predicts BKVAN remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of a commercial and an in-house qPCR test for quantitative detection of BK virus in kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: This was a prospective study with kidney transplant recipients from two large university hospitals in Brazil. Patients were screened for BKV infection every 3 months in the first year post-transplant with a commercial and an in-house real time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) test. BKVAN was confirmed based on histopathology. The area under the curve for plasma qPCR was determined from receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients were enrolled. Fifty-eight percent were male, 19.5% had diabetes mellitus, and 82% had the kidney transplanted from a deceased donor. BKV viremia was detected in 32.5% and BKVAN was diagnosed in 8 patients (4%). BKVAN was associated with viremia of 4.1 log copies/mL, using a commercial kit. The cut-off for the in-house assay was 6.1 log copies/mL. The linearity between the commercial kit and the in-house assay was R2=0.83. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that marked variability occurs in BKV viral load when different qPCR methodologies are used. The in-house qPCR assay proved clinically useful, a cheaper option in comparison to commercial qPCR kits. There is an urgent need to make BKV standards available to the international community.

Quantitative detection of BK virus in kidney transplant recipients: a prospective validation study / Detecção quantitativa de vírus BK em receptores de transplante renal: um estudo prospectivo de validação

Abstract Introduction: BK virus (BKV) infection in renal transplant patients may cause kidney allograft dysfunction and graft loss. Accurate determination of BKV viral load is critical to prevent BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) but the cut-off that best predicts BKVAN remains controversial. Objective: To evaluate the performance of a commercial and an in-house qPCR test for quantitative detection of BK virus in kidney transplant recipients. Methods: This was a prospective study with kidney transplant recipients from two large university hospitals in Brazil. Patients were screened for BKV infection every 3 months in the first year post-transplant with a commercial and an in-house real time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) test. BKVAN was confirmed based on histopathology. The area under the curve for plasma qPCR was determined from receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: A total of 200 patients were enrolled. Fifty-eight percent were male, 19.5% had diabetes mellitus, and 82% had the kidney transplanted from a deceased donor. BKV viremia was detected in 32.5% and BKVAN was diagnosed in 8 patients (4%). BKVAN was associated with viremia of 4.1 log copies/mL, using a commercial kit. The cut-off for the in-house assay was 6.1 log copies/mL. The linearity between the commercial kit and the in-house assay was R2=0.83. Conclusion: Our study shows that marked variability occurs in BKV viral load when different qPCR methodologies are used. The in-house qPCR assay proved clinically useful, a cheaper option in comparison to commercial qPCR kits. There is an urgent need to make BKV standards available to the international community.

Resumo Introdução: A infecção pelo vírus BK (BKV) em pacientes de transplante renal pode levar a disfunção do aloenxerto renal e perda do enxerto. A determinação precisa da carga viral do BKV é fundamental para prevenir a nefropatia associada ao BKV (BKVAN), mas o ponto de corte de melhor valor preditivo para BKVAN ainda é foco de debates. Objetivo: Avaliar o desempenho de um teste de qPCR comercial e outro desenvolvido internamente para detecção quantitativa de vírus BK em receptores de transplante renal. Métodos: O presente estudo prospectivo incluiu receptores de transplante renal de dois grandes hospitais universitários no Brasil. Os pacientes foram testados para infecção por BKV a cada três meses no primeiro ano pós-transplante com um teste comercial de reação em cadeia de polimerase quantitativa em tempo real (qPCR) e outro desenvolvido internamente. A presença de BKVAN foi confirmada com base na histopatologia. A área sob a curva para o qPCR plasmático foi determinada a partir da análise da característica de operação do receptor. Resultados: Um total de 200 pacientes foram incluídos. Cinquenta e oito por cento eram do sexo masculino, 19,5% tinham diabetes mellitus e 82% tiveram seus rins transplantados de doadores falecidos. Viremia de BKV foi detectada em 32,5% dos pacientes e oito (4%) foram diagnosticados com BKVAN. BKVAN foi associada a viremia de 4,1 log cópias/mL usando o kit comercial. O corte para o ensaio interno foi de 6,1 log cópias/mL. A linearidade entre o kit comercial e o ensaio interno foi R2 = 0,83. Conclusão: Nosso estudo demonstrou uma acentuada variabilidade na carga viral de BKV quando diferentes metodologias de qPCR foram utilizadas. O ensaio interno de qPCR mostrou-se clinicamente útil, além de ser uma opção menos onerosa em relação aos kits comerciais de qPCR. Há uma necessidade urgente de se definir padrões de BKV para a comunidade internacional.

Evaluation of diagnostic tests for cytomegalovirus active infection in renal transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a main viral infection after kidney transplantation. The diagnostic methods currently employed are pp65 antigenemia and nucleic acid amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and aim at detecting viral replication. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to evaluate and compare by both methods the incidence of CMV active infection in kidney transplant patients and to establishthe best clinical-laboratory correlation. METHODS: Thirty sequential kidney transplant recipients were enrolled in a single center prospective cohort study. Peripheral blood samples were drawn from day 15 until the 6th month after transplantation and tested for CMV replication by pp65 antigenemia and quantitative PCR assays (qPCR). RESULTS: Two hundred forty samples were analyzed and the incidence of active infection was similar by both methods. Time elapsed to the first positive test was almost identical but more samples tested positive by qPCR than by antigenemia in a behavior that was almost evenly distributed overtime. Agreement between tests was observed in 217 samples (90.4%; kappa = 0.529; p < 0.001) and in 25 patients the tests were concordant (83.3%; kappa = 0.667; p < 0.001). The evaluation of the diagnostic parameters for CMV replication revealed higher sensitivity for the qPCR test (82.1%) against antigenemia (59.0%). Quantitative PCR was also slightly more accurate than antigenemia. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that both methods are suitable and have almost equivalent accuracy for the detection of post-transplant cytomegalovirus replication. The choice for either test must take in consideration the demand, execution capability and cost-effectiveness at each institution.

Evaluation of diagnostic tests for cytomegalovirus active infection in renal transplant recipients / Avaliação de métodos diagnósticos para infecção ativa por citomegalovírus em receptores de transplante renal

Abstract Introduction: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a main viral infection after kidney transplantation. The diagnostic methods currently employed are pp65 antigenemia and nucleic acid amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and aim at detecting viral replication. Objective: The goal of this study was to evaluate and compare by both methods the incidence of CMV active infection in kidney transplant patients and to establishthe best clinical-laboratory correlation. Methods: Thirty sequential kidney transplant recipients were enrolled in a single center prospective cohort study. Peripheral blood samples were drawn from day 15 until the 6th month after transplantation and tested for CMV replication by pp65 antigenemia and quantitative PCR assays (qPCR). Results: Two hundred forty samples were analyzed and the incidence of active infection was similar by both methods. Time elapsed to the first positive test was almost identical but more samples tested positive by qPCR than by antigenemia in a behavior that was almost evenly distributed overtime. Agreement between tests was observed in 217 samples (90.4%; kappa = 0.529; p < 0.001) and in 25 patients the tests were concordant (83.3%; kappa = 0.667; p < 0.001). The evaluation of the diagnostic parameters for CMV replication revealed higher sensitivity for the qPCR test (82.1%) against antigenemia (59.0%). Quantitative PCR was also slightly more accurate than antigenemia. Conclusion: Our data demonstrate that both methods are suitable and have almost equivalent accuracy for the detection of post-transplant cytomegalovirus replication. The choice for either test must take in consideration the demand, execution capability and cost-effectiveness at each institution.

Resumo Introdução: Citomegalovírus (CMV) é uma importante causa de infecção viral após o transplante renal. Os métodos diagnósticos presentemente utilizados são a antigenemia pp-65 e os métodos que utilizam a amplificação de ácidos nucléicos pela reação em cadeia da polimerase (PCR) e visam à detecção da replicação viral. Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar e comparar a incidência de infecção ativa por CMV em pacientes transplantados renais pelos dois métodos e estabelecer a melhor correlação clínico-laboratorial. Métodos: Trinta pacientes transplantados renais seqüenciais em um único centro foram incluídos em um estudo de coorte prospectiva. Amostras de sangue periférico foram coletadas a partir do 15º dia até o 6º mês pós-transplante e avaliadas para replicação de CMV por Antigenemia pp-65 e PCR quantitativo (qPCR). Resultados: Foram analisadas 240 amostras e a incidência de infecção ativa foi similar pelos dois métodos. O tempo médio transcorrido desde o transplante até o primeiro teste com resultado positivo foi quase idêntico entretanto mais amostras tiveram resultado positivo por qPCR do que antigenemia, um comportamento que se manteve quase uniforme ao longo do tempo. Concordância entre os testes foi observada em 217 amostras (90,4%; kappa = 0,529; p < 0,001) e em 25 pacientes (83,3%; kappa = 0,667; p < 0,001). A avaliação dos parâmetros diagnósticos para replicação de CMV revelaram maior sensibilidade para qPCR (82,1%) contra antigenemia (59,0%). PCR quantitativo também foi levemente mais preciso do que antigenemia. Conclusão: Nossos dados demonstram que ambos os métodos são adequados e tem precisão quase equivalente para a detecção da replicação do CMV após o transplante renal. A escolha entre um ou outro deve levar em consideração a demanda, capacidade de execução e custo-efetividade em cada instituição.

Enhancing tuberculosis diagnosis by polymerase chain reaction: an experience at a tertiary hospital

Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) persists as a severe global public health issue. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of an in-house TB PCR (polymerase chain reaction) in sputum. Methods: DNA from sputum specimens were submitted to a nested-PCR protocol for the IS6110 region detection. PCR results were compared to those of the traditional methods for TB diagnosis, i.e., acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear microscopy and culture. We analyzed sputum samples obtained from 133 patients. Results: A total of 48 (36%) cultures yielded indeterminate results due to contamination. This high contamination rate may be explained by the fact that samples from fibrocystic patients were included in this study. Additionally, other five samples were positive for nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). Therefore, it was possible to compare 80 patients for M. tuberculosis detection. We found 14 positive samples: five presented positive results in the three methods (5/14; 35.7%), two were positive in culture and PCR (2/14; 14.3%), one was positive in AFB and PCR (1/14; 7.1%), five were positive only in PCR (5/14; 35.7%) and 1 was positive only in culture (1/14; 7.1%). Thus, positivity rates for each technique were: 7.5% for AFB (6/80), 10% for culture (8/80) and 16.25% for PCR (13/80). Among the 48 patients who had indeterminate results in sputum culture, two samples were positive in PCR. Conclusion: Considering the limitations of the traditional methods, the use of PCR as a molecular technique could be advantageous for TB diagnosis.

Determinação do limite mínimo de detecção da técnica de Nested-PCR para os poliomavírus JC e BK / Assessment of minimum detection limit of Nested-PCR for JC and BK polyomaviruses

Introduction: Polyomaviruses (BKV and JCV) cause infection mainly in immunocompromised adults. A sensitive and specific diagnosis tool is fundamental to demonstrate the BKV and JCV infections. Nowadays many laboratories are using a PCR technique for detecting polyomaviruses genome in clinical samples. In this context, the purpose of this study is to determine the threshold of detection of the nested-PCR for polyomaviruses JC and BK. Methods: Serial dilutions of the samples of BKV and JCV of known concentration (100 copies/mL, 50 copies/mL, 25 copies/mL, 10 copies/mL, 5 copies/mL, and 1 copy/ml) were subjected to the technique of nested-PCR. All dilutions were tested 11 times to determine the minimum detection limit. Results: The minimum detection limit of the nested-PCR for JC and BK viruses was 25 copies/mL. This dilution (25 copies/mL) showed 100% PCR positive reaction. Furthermore, we found that weak positive results were obtained at dilutions of 1,5 and 10 copies/mL in some repetitions. Dilutions of 25, 50, and 100 copies/mL always had very positive results. Conclusions: These values are similar to those reported in other studies, contributing to the indication of this PCR for potential diagnostic purposes.

Introdução: Os poliomavírus (JCV e BKV) causam infecções principalmente em adultos imunocomprometidos. Um diagnóstico sensível e específico é de fundamental importância para os pacientes portadores de JCV e BKV. Atualmente alguns laboratórios têm utilizado a técnica de PCR para a detecção do material genético destes vírus em amostras clínicas. Assim, o objetivo deste estudo é determinar o limite mínimo de detecção da técnica de nested-PCR para os poliomavírus JC e BK. Métodos: Diluições seriadas (100 cópias/mL; 50 cópias/mL; 25 cópias/mL; 10 cópias/mL; 5 cópias/mL e 1 cópia/mL) de controles positivos comerciais de JCV e BKV com concentrações conhecidas foram submetidas à técnica de nested-PCR semi-duplex. Todas as diluições foram testadas 11 vezes para determinação do limite mínimo de detecção. Resultados: O limite mínimo de detecção da reação de nested-PCR para os vírus JC e BK foi de 25 cópias/mL para ambos, com 100% de positividade das diluições testadas na reação de PCR. Ainda, pudemos observar que resultados positivos fracos foram obtidos nas diluições de 1, 5 e 10 cópias/mL em algumas das repetições realizadas. As diluições de 25, 50 e 100 cópias/mL sempre obtiveram resultado rancamente positivo. Conclusões: Estes valores são semelhantes aos relatados em outros estudos, contribuindo para a indicação desta reação de PCR para potenciais fins diagnósticos.

Bacteriologia da fibrose cística / Cystic fibrosis bacteriology

O exame bacteriológico é um dos principais parâmetros que auxiliam o diagnóstico e manuseio da infecção respiratória dos pacientes com Fibrose Cística (FC). Os microrganismos que colonizam e infectam o paciente fibrocístico determinam o tratamento, a qualidade de vida, as perspectivas para o transplante e a sua sobrevida global. A identificação precisa de patógenos respiratórios é essencial para o tratamento da infecção, seja como guia para o uso adequado de antibióticos por longos períodos para os pacientes com infecção bacteriana crônica ou para a aplicação adequada de medidas de controle de infecção. Embora exista um espectro limitado de patógenos respiratórios classicamente associados à doença respiratóriana FC, um número crescente de microrganismos vem sendo reconhecido como potenciais agentes patogênicos. O espectro de patógenos em FC varia com a idade do paciente, mas, de uma forma geral, é bem estabelecido na literatura que existem quatro bactérias “clássicas”: Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa e o complexo B. cepacia (CBC)...

The bacteriological culture is one of the main parameters that support the diagnosis and management of the respiratoryinfection in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). The microorganisms that colonize and infect CF patients determine the treatment,quality of life, the lung transplant possibility and their overall survival. The accurate identification of respiratory pathogensis essential for the treatment of infection, either to guide the appropriate use of antibiotics for long periods to patientswith chronic bacterial infection or to the proper implementation of infection control measures. Although there is a limitedspectrum of respiratory pathogens classically associated with the respiratory disease in CF, an increasing number of microorganismshas been recognized as potential pathogens. The spectrum of pathogens in CF varies with the patients age but,in general, it is well established in the literature that there are four "classic" pathogens: Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilusinfluenzae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the B. cepacia complex (Bcc)...

Polymerase chain reaction as a useful and simple tool for rapid diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis in a Brazilian tertiary care hospital.

Meningitis is a severe and potentially fatal form of tuberculosis. The diagnostic workup involves detection of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by microscopy or culture, however, the difficulty in detecting the organism poses a challenge to diagnosis. The use of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the diagnostic approach to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) meningitis has been reported as a fast and accurate method, with several commercial kits available. As an alternative, some institutions have been developing inexpensive in house assays. In our institution, we use an in house PCR for tuberculosis. We analyzed the performance of our PCR for the diagnosis of MTB meningitis in 148 consecutive patients, using MTB culture as gold standard. The sensitivity and specificity of CSF PCR for the diagnosis of MTB meningitis was 50% and 98.6% respectively with a concordance with CSF mycobacterial culture of 96% (Kappa=0.52). In contrast to CSF cultures for MTB, our PCR test is a fast, simple and inexpensive tool to diagnose tuberculous meningitis with a performance similar to that obtained with the available commercial kits.

Polymerase chain reaction as a useful and simple tool for rapid diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis in a Brazilian tertiary care hospital

Meningitis is a severe and potentially fatal form of tuberculosis. The diagnostic workup involves detection of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) by microscopy or culture, however, the difficulty in detecting the organism poses a challenge to diagnosis. The use of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the diagnostic approach to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) meningitis has been reported as a fast and accurate method, with several commercial kits available. As an alternative, some institutions have been developing inexpensive in house assays. In our institution, we use an in house PCR for tuberculosis. We analyzed the performance of our PCR for the diagnosis of MTB meningitis in 148 consecutive patients, using MTB culture as gold standard. The sensitivity and specificity of CSF PCR for the diagnosis of MTB meningitis was 50 percent and 98.6 percent respectively with a concordance with CSF mycobacterial culture of 96 percent (Kappa=0.52). In contrast to CSF cultures for MTB, our PCR test is a fast, simple and inexpensive tool to diagnose tuberculous meningitis with a performance similar to that obtained with the available commercial kits.

Determinação do limite mínimo de detecção da técnica de PCR “nested” para o vírus da hepatite B (HBV) / Evaluation of minimum detection limit to hepatitis B virus (HBV) PCR “nested”

Mundialmente, a hepatite pelo vírus B (HBV) é considerada um dos maiores problemas de saúde pública, apesar da vacinação. A Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS) estima que mais de 2 bilhões de pessoas estejam infectadas pelo HBV. O Brasil é classificado como área de incidência intermediária pela OMS. No entanto, estudos de prevalência detectaram diferenças de índices de infecção nas regiões geográficas: 8% na região Amazônica, 2,5% nas regiões Centro-Oeste e Nordeste, 2% na Sudeste e 1% na região Sul. Um diagnóstico sensível e específico é de fundamental importância para os pacientes portadores do HBV. O objetivo deste estudo foi determinar o limite mínimo de detecção da técnica de PCR “nested” “in house” para o HBV. Diluições seriadas de uma amostra quantificada de HBV (1000 cópias/mL; 750 cópias/mL; 500 cópias/mL; 250 cópias/mL) foram submetidas à técnica de PCR “nested”. O alvo da amplificação por PCR foi a região do core e pré-core do vírus. Para extração dos ácidos nucléicos da amostra foi empregado o kit comercial QIAmp. O limite mínimo de detecção encontrado foi de 500 cópias/mL ou 10 cópias por reação de PCR.

All over the world, the hepatitis B virus (HBV) is considered one of the major problems of public health, despite vaccination. World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that more than 2 billions of persons are infected by HBV. Brazil is classified as an area of intermediary incidence by WHO. However, prevalence studies have detected differences of infection indexes in geographic regions: 8% in the Amazonian region, 2,5% in middle-west and Northeast, 2% in Southeast and 1% in South. A sensitive and specific diagnosis is very important to the HBV carrier patients. The aim of this study was to determine the minimum limit of detection of the nested PCR in house technique for HBV. Serial dilutions of one quantified sample of HBV (1000 copies/mL; 750 copies/mL; 500 copies/mL; 250 copies/mL) were submitted to a nested PCR. The target of PCR was viral core and pre-core region. Commercial kit, QiAmp, was employed to purify nucleic acids from the sample. The minimum detection limit found was 500 copies/mL or 10 copies per PCR reaction.

Comparação dos métodos de reação em cadeia da polimerase qualitativo e antigenemia PP65 para o diagnóstico de infecção por citomegalovírus em pacientes imunossuprimidos / Comparison between qualitative polymerase chain reaction and PP65 antigenemia for the diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infection in immunosuppressed patients

Introdução: A infecção por citomegalovírus (CMV) é freqüente e acomete com significativa morbimortalidade indivíduos imunossuprimidos, especialmente transplantados e pacientes HIV positivos com doença avançada. Objetivo: Este estudo visou a comparar o desempenho dos métodos reação em cadeia da polimerase qualitativo (PCR) e antigenemia pp65 para o diagnóstico de infecção por CMV em pacientes imunossuprimidos. Métodos: O estudo foi realizado em 216 amostras de sangue total coletadas de 85 pacientes, entre agosto de 2006 e janeiro de 2007, provenientes da internação ou ambulatório do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA). Resultados: Entre as 216 amostras analisadas, 35 amostras apresentaram resultados positivos e 181 amostras apresentaram resultados negativos em uma e/ou outra técnica. Destas 35 amostras positivas, 16 foram positivas em ambas as técnicas; 12 apresentaram-se positivas pela PCR e negativas pela antigenemia; e sete amostras apresentaram-se positivas pela antigenemia e negativas pela PCR. Considerando a antigenemia como padrão-ouro, a técnica de PCR mostrou sensibilidade de 69,6%, especificidade de 93,8%, valor preditivo positivo de 57,1% e valor preditivo negativo de 96,3%. O coeficiente de correlação kappa foi de 0,578. Discussão: Este resultado demonstra que a PCR qualitativa apresenta moderada sensibilidade e alta especificidade para o diagnóstico de infecção para CMV. Apesar de suas limitações, pode ser utilizada para exclusão do diagnóstico em pacientes com suspeita de infecção por CMV, por ser um método mais simples, de baixo custo e de fácil execução.

Introduction: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is frequent and has significant morbidity and mortality in immunosuppressed individuals, especially in transplanted and HIV-positive patients with advanced disease. Objective: This study compared the performance of qualitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and pp65 antigenemia methods for the diagnosis of CMV infection in immunosuppressed patients. Methods: A total of 216 of peripheral blood samples were collected from 85 inpatients or outpatients, from August 2006 through January 2007 from Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA). Results: Of the 216 samples, 35 had positive results and 181 were negative with regard to one and/or another technique. Of the 35 positive samples, 16 were positive in both techniques; 12 were positive for PCR and negative for antigenemia, and seven samples were positive for antigenemia but negative for PCR. Considering antigenemia as the gold standard, the PCR technique showed sensitivity of 69.6%, specificity of 93.8%, positive predictive value of 57.1%, and negative predictive value of 96.3%. The kappa correlation coefficient was 0.578. Discussion: These results demonstrate that the qualitative PCR has moderate sensitivity and high specificity for the diagnosis of CMV infection. Despite its limitations, it can be used for diagnosis exclusion in patients under CMV infection suspicion because of its simplicity, low cost and of easy execution.

Proposta de reação em cadeia da polimerase (PCCR semi-nested para pesquisa e diferenciação dos vírus BK e JC. / Proposal of sem-nested polimerase chain reaction (PCR for diagnosisng and differentiating BK and JC virus

Objetivos: Implantar e otimizar a reação em cadeia da polimerase(PCR) semi-nested para pesquisa e diferenciação dos virus BK e JC a partir de amostras clínicas armazenamentos. Métodos: Foram testadas 9 amostras clínicas (urina e liquor). As amostras foram submetidas à PCR semi-neste, e foram testadas também com diferentes condições, visando a otimização da reação . Resultados: Primeiramente os controles positivos foram testados quanto à especificidade através de uma PCR direta, e os resultados obtidos confirmaram a especificidade. Quando testadas por PCR semi-nested, as amostras apresentaram os seguintes resultados: 100% (nove amostras) positivas para virus BK e 66,6% (seis amostras) positivas para virus JC. Conclusões: Otimizou-se a reação PCR semi-nested, específica para a indentificação dos poliomavírus, para assim atuar como uma ferramenta diagnóstica para melhor acompanhamento de pacientes imunocomptometidos.